{"id":424,"date":"2018-06-04T10:08:40","date_gmt":"2018-06-04T09:08:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theoscience.org\/?p=424"},"modified":"2018-06-04T10:12:42","modified_gmt":"2018-06-04T09:12:42","slug":"quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/2018\/06\/04\/quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantum Weirdness Replaced by Classical Fluid Dynamics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><i>Physics<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Date: March, 2014<\/p>\n<p>Source: <i>Hawai Institute for Unified Physics (HIUP)<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p>\n<div class=\"original-url\">\n<div>\n<p>A new interpretation of Quantum Physics, in line with Louis de Broglie &#8220;pilot wave&#8221; theory, and David Bohm causal interpretation, which may give a deterministic approach of quantum physics, using classical fluid dynamics. This is paving the way for a unification of fundamental forces. Even entanglement, this so weird &#8220;spooky instantaneous interaction at a distance&#8221;, may have a realistic substantiation via wormholes (Maldacena\/Susskind &#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1306.0533\">https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1306.0533<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Modern Science (Theoretical Physics) is based, since the 1920&#8217;s, on the Bohr&#8217;s interpretation of Quantum Physics which does not provide with an intellectually sustainable paradigm for the representation of Reality. Most physicists use quantum theory as a tool for calculating results and &#8220;leave it to the philososhers&#8221; to wonder what&#8217;s really going on behind the mathematics. This has leaded to the loss of causal interpretation of phenomenon (cause -&gt; effect). Einstein always disagreed wit it : &#8220;<em>God does not play dice<\/em>&#8220;. The new interpretation quoted here is in line with Einstein, de Broglie, Schr\u00f6dinger, Bohm, Bell,&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Articles:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/hiup.org\/quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics\/\">https:\/\/hiup.org\/quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics\/<\/a> (March 21,2014)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2013-07-fluid-dynamics-mimic-quantum-mechanics.html#nRlv\">https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2013-07-fluid-dynamics-mimic-quantum-mechanics.html#nRlv<\/a> (July 29, 2013)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Physics Date: March, 2014 Source: Hawai Institute for Unified Physics (HIUP) A new interpretation of Quantum Physics, in line with Louis de Broglie &#8220;pilot wave&#8221; theory, and David Bohm causal interpretation, which may give a deterministic approach of quantum physics, using classical fluid dynamics. This is paving the way for a unification of fundamental forces. &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/2018\/06\/04\/quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Quantum Weirdness Replaced by Classical Fluid Dynamics&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[110],"class_list":["post-424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","tag-quantum-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=424"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":429,"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424\/revisions\/429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoscience.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}